There have been efforts to make peace a social science by various academics. After the Second World War, American scholars focused on peace in relation to the cold war. However, Johan Galtung (Norway) made a break with this and referenced peace to reducing structural violence, that was, the conflict between developed and developing countries. Later Galtung expanded peace to be a response to the ascendent cultural violence in terms of religious, ethnic, caste, racial and economic conflicts.
Meanwhile, India had a very different trajectory of peace and peace education. Gandhi’s autobiography (Experiments with Truth) was seen as the personification of nonviolence and peace. Achieving peace was viewed as a psychological state of mind of a person that was achievable through a particular way of thinking and living. This was more holistic and was viewed as a non-dualistic approach.
In 2001 – 2010 during the UN Decade of the Culture of Peace, there was a great deal of experimentation and research taken up in numerous countries on different ways of introducing peacemaking into school curriculum and classrooms, or what was termed later as education for peace.
To celebrate International Day of Peace, we will focus on some of the features of both Western and Gandhian ways of carrying out peacemaking. This will give us greater understanding on the range of perspectives of peacebuilding.
Leave a Reply